Pochettino could fill a textbook with the lessons learned during this Gold Cup run – GOAL looks at the top five

HOUSTON – From the start, Mauricio Pochettino and the members of the U.S. men's national team said the principal objective this summer was to win the Gold Cup. And while that was accurate, it doesn't tell the entire story. The Gold Cup, in many ways, was a means to an end.

The USMNT didn't win the Gold Cup. But here's what Pochettino and his pieced-together USMNT squad DID do: they learned. There were easy lessons and thorny lessons and painful lessons, but all that knowledge will be applied to preparations for the predominant goal: the 2026 World Cup.

In the end, the U.S. fell short, losing to Mexico 2-1 in the Gold Cup final. Ultimately, that may not be the worst thing in the world.

That will depend on what comes next. Can the U.S. convert lessons into execution? Or will the negative moments linger on during the buildup to the World Cup? This summer was equal parts foundation building and drama, but which of those two will win out in the long run?

"I think it's been a massive lesson for us, and I think that is priceless," Pochettino said after the final. "I think this was an amazing tournament to realize that way that we want to grow and that is the way that, I think, we are going to find a way to compete better and better and be very competitive in the ways we want to be. It's a very painful night because, when you lose a trophy or a game, it's really painful.

"But the most important thing is for us to have our heads up because I think this tournament was fantastic. I think we can keep going. That is the way we build our journey into the World Cup. And I have no doubt we are going to be really, really competitive."

Pochettino could fill a textbook with the lessons learned during this Gold Cup run. GOAL looks at the top five.

Getty ImagesThe culture is a work in progress

One of the keywords of the summer was "culture." From the moment the U.S. lost to Panama in the Nations League semifinals, culture took center stage. This summer, more than before, Pochettino had a front row seat for a cultural experience that, especially for someone from Argentina, had to feel totally alien.

It began with the decision from Christian Pulisic to skip the Gold Cup, one that immediately turned contentious. The controversy ebbed and flowed throughout the summer, creating plenty of headlines and podcast topics and talking-head talking points that were about anything other than soccer. Ultimately, that decision – and it's ramifications – will have a lasting effect, and, although Pochettino didn't outright say it, he did allude to it throughout the tournament.

"Players need to listen and to stick with our plan," he told reporters early in the tournament. "They cannot dictate the plan. The most important thing is that we explain why we decided not to include him in the two friendly games. And then if you have some problems, no, that is not my problem to understand. When I signed my contract in the federation, I am the head coach. I am not a mannequin."

Pochettino spent the summer driving that point home. Before the tournament, he reiterated that national team duty wasn't a vacation or a golf outing, but an honor and a responsibility. His decision to exclude several experienced, familiar faces was seen as a reminder to them, but also a challenge to newcomers. The message clear: no one is above the team.

That point was taken in by the 26 players in the squad this summer, all of whom continuously said that they bonded via the experience. After months of hearing how little fight the USMNT had, they were determined refute that notion – and throughout this tournament, they generally did. Now, those from this summer's squad are tasked with translating that to those who absent. That, ultimately, will define what the culture looks like going forward.

"I think it has to translate right away, or I think Mauricio just probably won't call people in," Tyler Adams said. "Because the culture that we have, it doesn't matter who you are. If it's guys here that played well, if it's guys coming back into the group, if you're coming back from injury, just whatever it is. The culture and the emotion is the first thing that he wants to see, and I think that's going to lead to positive results."

AdvertisementGetty Images SportLevels of international quality

Trust is essential, and its absence raises red flags. That fact was exposed during the pre-Gold Cup Switzerland game, and it was so obvious, Pochettino learned immediately. This is a deep player pool, sure, but, when it comes to players that Pochettino can actually trust, there's a line that needs to be drawn.

That Switzerland game, in particular, will have been a wake-up call, one that showed the difference between the quality needed to be called into the USMNT and the quality needed to actually contribute. On that day, the U.S. were embarrassed, shredded for four first-half goals, and in the Gold Cup that followed, Pochettino responded.

After experimenting with lineups in the friendlies, he essentially locked in during the Gold Cup. He started just 14 different players over the six matches. In each of the three knockout games, he turned to the exact same starting XI. There were clear levels of players, and those not up to the mark generally didn't play much.

The final, meanwhile, drove home a similar point: that there's an even higher standard. This group did well to get to the final, yes, but that match showed the step down from the top tier to the second tier. This summer, the U.S. faced three top 30 teams – and lost to all three. Yes, players such as Alex Freeman, Max Arfsten, Patrick Agyemang and Sebastian Berhalter can compete. But at the moment, they are not yet on the level of Sergino Dest, Antonee Robinson, Ricardo Pepi or Weston McKennie.

Realistically, that isn't a surprise, there's a natural progression. But it's still a key lesson. Leading up to next summer, there are perhaps 15 players that, when fit, Pochettino can completely trust to play at a World Cup level. He discovered a few more this summer. But realistically, the learning from the summer is that most players on this particular Gold Cup squad are not yet there.

Getty Images SportTillman, Richards can be counted on

Reflecting on the former point, there were two players who made significant progress. There were more than two, in truth, but Malik Tillman and Chris Richards were chief among them, moving from rostered players to leaders.

That was Richards' primary aim, he told GOAL, and he spent all summer proving it. Richards was CB1 heading into the summer and that didn't change. What did change, though, was his role. Richards is now on the same tier as Tyler Adams and Tim Ream as one of the leaders on this team. He's confident enough and capable enough to wear the armband and, given the emphasis on culture, adding a new leader will be invaluable for the USMNT.

Tillman, meanwhile, isn't a vocal leader. He is a relatively quiet, shy person – except when a ball is at his feet. He hadn't gotten many chances to prove himself in a USMNT shirt prior to this summer, but has now made his case to be a starter next summer.

"The huge positive within this group is that guys have stepped up who had maybe taken a backseat previously," Ream said. "It's not that they were quiet mice that just sat there and listened or anything. But take Chris Richards, for example. He stepped up into a more vocal role in terms of leading and making sure guys are doing the right things and in the right positions. Malik is another one, the quietest guy ever, but he's leading by example.

"You have guys who are vocal and guys who lead by example. And to find and unearth more of those within this group has been a really big positive."

Getty Images SportCreating space can be an issue

Without Pulisic, Tim Weah and Folarin Balogun in the attack, the USMNT were always going to struggle for width this summer. It was tougher than expected, though, as myriad absences underscored just how few players this team has that can keep opposing defenses honest.

Pochettino was missing players with the ability to stretch a backline. With Robinson and Dest also out, the U.S. were missing game-breaking fullbacks that force defenders to cover every inch of the field. Without them, the U.S. had to either play through a congested middle or hoof the ball up to Agyemang. In the end, there just weren't enough ways to really challenge the best backlines they faced this summer.

That's not an easy fix. It's been made abundantly clear that this team is short on bona fide attacking options, those who can do real damage at a World Cup level. To mitigate their losses, the U.S. played with two attacking midfielders in TIllman and Diego Luna and, while both are supremely talented, neither can really stretch a backline. As a result, Agyemang was often on an island. It wasn't sustainable.

If the U.S. wants to be a top-level attacking team, they'll need their best players healthy. If not, the problems from this summer will only be magnified against stiffer competition.